Back when I was a regular columnist for the local newspaper, I systematically made my decisions on what to write about--above and beyond the journalistic question of will it play in Peoria. One of the factors was the timeliness.
That's how I ended up writing
this column in July 2012, in which I appreciated the Americans with Disabilities Act. The anniversary of that legislation was coming up and I timed my column for that. It was published on July 20, 2012, in time for the anniversary date of July 26th when the law became effective.
I wrote in that piece:
The ADA is also a wonderful example of why we need government, and how political parties can work constructively toward the betterment of the people — a concept that has become old-fashioned and is drowned out increasingly by the loud and harsh yelling that accompanies the trivial pursuits played by politicians and commentators.
I had no idea that
tRump would get elected to the Oval Office four years later, and that the dysfunctional politics of 2012 that I was complaining about would come across in 2020 as noble and saintly discussions!
I hope that the elections in November will get us back to doing the greatest work for the greater good of the country and the world.
The following is the column from 2012:
*************************************
The Register-Guard (July 20, 2012)
The United States’ current
dysfunctional politics reminds me of the contrast with a serious piece
of history-making legislation: the Americans with Disabilities Act,
which was signed into law in July 1990.
I was in graduate school in Los Angeles
and in the early phase of getting to know the new country when the ADA
was introduced in Congress. The idea of the act appealed to me as noble:
that people with disabilities ought to be accommodated so that they,
too, can rise to their potential and freely engage in the pursuit of
happiness.
Having grown up in India, I had witnessed
at close quarters many different ways in which friends and relatives
were restricted, sometimes literally to within their homes, because of
disabilities. A distant uncle, for instance, who lost his eyesight as a
young adult became practically unwanted in his own family because he had
become a “burden.” India’s public spaces are daily reminders of the
extreme challenges in everyday life for those who lack full physical
abilities.
If a great society is identifiable by how
it takes care of those with limitations of any kind, then the unfolding
of the ADA — from the introduction of the bill to its implementation,
which continues — has been a story about which we truly can be proud.
The ADA was not without its opponents.
While it was an academic exercise for me to learn in coursework about
how cost-benefit analysis is employed in public policymaking, it sounded
quite awful when critics argued that the ADA would increase costs.
Claims that the law would become a mandate conveniently overlooked the
reality that those with disabilities were being treated as less than
equals. When religious institutions were concerned that they would be
forced to accommodate disabled people by spending money on structural
changes to their buildings, I was struck by how much they seemed to be
going against their own fundamental teachings on how human beings should
be treated.
The bill eventually passed and became the
law of the land, despite a divided government then — the U.S. Senate and
the House were in the control of the Democratic Party, and a Republican
president, George H.W. Bush, was in the White House. The final passage
of the bill was, for all purposes, completely and totally bipartisan — a
world away from the contemporary bickering over all things trivial!
The implementation phase of the ADA
coincided with my first few years of gainful employment. In the small
public agency that I worked for, we now had an additional responsibility
of conforming to the ADA.
It became even more fascinating as the
Internet gave us all an entirely new way to deal with information, which
required us to think about accommodating those who were challenged
visually. Later, when I returned to the academic world, I was impressed
with how the ADA translated to accommodating students constrained by
their hearing disabilities.
The ADA-led accommodations have become so
much a part of my existence here in the United States that I forget how
different conditions are elsewhere — until I cross our borders, that is.
My recent experiences in different parts of the world were reminders of
the phenomenal advances in the United States on this front.
Accommodating the disabled has required us
to spend on everything from sidewalk improvements to sign language
interpreters. These are additional expenses, yes, when compared to how
we conducted our affairs before 1990. But I bet there are very few
people in this country anymore who would ever question these kinds of
“expenses,” because we fully understand the value these deliver — a
value that cannot be captured through any bean counting or cost-benefit
analysis.
The ADA is also a wonderful example of why
we need government, and how political parties can work constructively
toward the betterment of the people — a concept that has become
old-fashioned and is drowned out increasingly by the loud and harsh
yelling that accompanies the trivial pursuits played by politicians and
commentators.
