Claudia Dreifus, whose reputation as the NY Times science writer has now been eclipsed by the fame and notoriety as a result of the book on higher education that she co-authored with Andrew Hacker, has a neat interview with Dr. Samatha Joyce, whose team of scientists were the first independent trained and qualified observers to investigate and report on the crisis. In response to Dreifus' question comparing Japan's recent and ongoing nuclear crisis with the BPO spill, Joyce replies:
No one can prevent earthquakes. That’s up to Mother Nature.Yes, indeed. Every major energy incident over the last forty years ought to have sharpened our attention on how much we are tied down by fossil fuels and nuclear power, and yet here we are in 2011 with carbon and nukes even more dominant in our lives than ever before.
However, building nuclear power plants on an island adjacent to an active tectonic zone is inherently dangerous. Likewise, deepwater drilling into gas-overcharged sediments is dangerous. For me, both of these disasters are a very loud plea for green energy.
I wonder why. Is it because technology to tap into other energy sources has not developed at the rate at which we think it ought to have? Were/are we naive to think that somehow green energy technology will arise out of whatever levels of science and technology we now have? If we were to use a comparison, and suppose that an iPhone symbolizes the level of green energy technology. How much ever something like an iPhone might have fascinated people fifty years ago, well, it would have been impossible at that time given the scientific understanding we had then and the technological capabilities, right? So, along that line of thinking, how far are we from an "iPhone green energy" technology?
For sure, I would hate for us to continue to burn, smoke, spill, and radiate for another fifty years.
No comments:
Post a Comment