In this structure, problems are in plenty. Universities offer such a diluted and distorted version of liberal education that we insiders are the ones giving liberal education that awful stink. Here is an example: at my university, a student can major in the social sciences and minor in geography, and successfully graduate with not even a tenth of the requirements coming from the sciences. This is merely one of the gazillion possibilities of students legitimately avoiding being liberally educated even as they earn their diplomas at the colleges and universities all over the country. Not the well-rounded liberal education at all.
My point has always been that such an education is a waste of time and money. We might as well merely offer professional training. We should stop referring to what we do as liberal education. Why call it liberal education and offer something else?
At the same time, we have been completely marginalizing professional education too. Instead of providing career and technical education to those students who might prefer that, we put that down as some kind of an inferior option and we force all students to go through the hoops of whatever that is we do at four-year schools anymore.
No wonder then we are finding ourselves all twisted trying to figure out the "real payoff of a college degree." To a large extent, Ronnie L. Booth, president of Tri-County Technical College, near Greenville, S.C., articulates the points that I try to get across to people:
A vocational degree is not for everyone, he readily admits, but many of his students are arriving with four-year degrees in hand, looking for something practical. In coming months, he will direct Tri-County's academic counselors to more aggressively steer students away from fields and majors that might prove a bad fit. Don't like the sight of blood or the smell of bodily fluids? Nursing might not be for you. Interested in engineering? Let's have a serious talk about your grades in algebra.In healthcare, which has been one of the fastest growing sectors, ""It looks like B.A. is now entry-level, or it's becoming that way." The jobs that didn't require a four-year degree are rapidly evaporating:
"Better to find out on the front end," he says. "I believe in truth in advertising."
More parents and students, he says, need to "understand that someone has to pay the bills." In his region, he frequently meets waiters and waitresses who have four-year degrees, and he has a friend whose daughter went to college to study dance. She is working in retail.
"That is not what Daddy had anticipated," Mr. Booth says in a Southern drawl. "I believe in a broad educational program, things that make you a good citizen, but I am not sure that it is necessary to rack up $50,000 or $100,000 in debt to get that—and then not to be able to get employment. I have told my children that one of Daddy's goals is to get you off my payroll."
The erosion of midlevel jobs goes beyond nursing. Experts say several forces are at work. Automation has eliminated many transcription and clerical jobs. Cost pressures have led hospitals and other health-care providers to push many routine tasks onto medical assistants and other lower-paid workers.The system is so rigged that the youth seem to have no choice but to get a college degree, even if it means that they will be underemployed:
Pharmacies, for example, increasingly employ a mix of licensed pharmacists—who now often need a doctorate—and technicians who fill prescriptions with only limited training.
The shift to electronic medical records, meanwhile, has eliminated many traditional jobs maintaining patient records but has created a wealth of new opportunities for those with coding skills.
At the same time, the increasing complexity of medicine, along with an increased focus on measuring and improving patient care, has raised the bar on educational requirements for some jobs. An Institute of Medicine committee in 2010, for example, recommended that 80% of registered nurses have bachelor's degrees by 2020, meaning nurses with associate's degrees may soon find themselves in the position LPNs face today.
In the short term, we're still obviously digging out of the jobs hole left by the recession. Unemployment for college graduates is higher than normal. Underemployment is more prevalent, though it's less severe than college critics portray, and perhaps no worse than during the Reagan days. It's the long view that's cloudier. Maybe, as the recession's impact fades, the economy will naturally go back to quickly churning out more jobs for high skill workers, and academics like Beaudry and his colleagues will be proven wrong. Or, perhaps they're right, and we'll need to wait for another great tech revolution before the market for educated workers goes back to growing the way it did 15 years ago.We can't say for sure. But we do know that young people are safer with a degree than without one.One would think that all these mean that now is a real good time to seriously think about what it is to be educated. Here is an example: how much math should we require that students do? Or, even if we think that the math will do them good for critical thinking skills, which I believe it does, should we reconsider how we teach math? We need to look into such questions because "less than a quarter of U.S. workers report using math any more complicated than basic fractions and percentages during the course of their jobs.":
And, here is the interesting aspect of it all. Remember how we systematically treat technical training as some kind of a second-class option that the young should be discouraged from? Ahem, they need math!
So, quo vadis?
Upper level blue collar, e.g. craft and repair workers like skilled construction trades and mechanics Lower level blue collar, e.g. factory workers and truck drivers
2 comments:
To
Mr Arne Duncan
Secretary
United States Department of Education
400 Maryland Ave. SW
LBJ Education Building, 7W311
Washington DC 20202
Dear Secretary Duncan,
Please listen to Prof Sriram Khé . Meet with him for 1 hour and listen to his ideas. You will successfully make education in America , far better, more effective and at half the cost.
Thanking You
Yours sincerely
An interested non citizen
WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thanks, Ramesh ...
Post a Comment