Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Violence and humanity. Some are more important than others?

There is not a day when there is no violent act anywhere on the planet.  Humans being humans we kill and rape and do things that many of us might not even be able to imagine.

As atrocious and horrible those incidents are, I suspect we never get to hear and read about most of them because they just don't get reported.  Or, if they do show up in the news, it might be geographically restricted.  And then there are some that get global coverage.

Almost always, the tragedies that strike the poor countries get very little coverage compared to events in rich countries.  Here too we display that human trait, I suppose, in being a lot more fascinated with the lifestyles of the rich and famous while condemning to anonymity the poor and the disadvantaged.

The Boston violence was an awful act.  Horrible and senseless violence.  I certainly would like to torture the life out of the crappy humans who carried that out.

But, even within the US, we have witnessed a lot of violence.  The killing of children and adults at a school in Connecticut.  The killings at a Gurudwara.  The movie theater killings.  The reactions to each of these events seem to be very different.  It is almost as if we have some kind of a metric that guides the media, social, and political responses to the killings.

Now, all those are within the US.  Meanwhile, bloody violence happens on a daily basis all around the world--a lot more in some countries than in others.  In Pakistan or Afghanistan or Iraq or Congo or ... the magnitude of violence against civilians is a lot more, and on a daily basis.  Most of those don't even blip in our radars.  And even if they do, they don't stay on the radars for long.

The violence itself depresses me.  As one who even prefers to avoid verbal conflicts, and as one who doesn't even like the idea of water pistols, I literally feel weakened when I watch the blood and gore of the violence. I force myself, sometimes, to read and watch news items about them because I tell myself that I can't simply close my eyes and wish them away.  I owe it to my fellow humans to understand such suffering.  And, of course, I need to do this so that I can be a better educator.

On top of the violence that depresses me, I find it terrible that a human life is not the same anywhere on the planet.  There seems to be a collective ennui when it comes to the loss of the lives of humans who were doing nothing but tending to their daily lives in some parts of the world.  The innocent civilians who die by the hundreds and thousands in many, many countries of the world do not make it even to the back pages of the papers, leave alone the front pages.

A strange interpretation of "what it is to be human" that we walk around with when we do not pay attention to, for instance, the following from recent days:
A human's life in one part of the world is not the same as a human's life in another part of the world?  How can that be!  As Shakespeare wrote in The Merchant of Venice:
If you prick us, do we not bleed?
If you tickle us, do we not laugh?
If you poison us, do we not die?
And if you wrong us, shall we not revenge?
If we are like you in the rest, we will resemble you in that
Well, here is to hoping for peace on the planet.  Everywhere on the planet.

5 comments:

Ramesh said...

Alas, man is not born equal Sriram. Never has been in history and sadly may never be in the future. Life is but a random throw of dice. Right place, right time and you are a hero. Wrong place, wrong time, and well .....

Not sure what it means to be a person anymore. Not even sure, what it means to live ..

Mr. Thissell said...

“Everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms—to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way.”
― Viktor E. Frankl, Man's Search for Meaning

According to Frankl, a Holocaust survivor, "humans are a deciding being." The horrific actions taken by individuals around the world are influenced by the dice they were thrown, but ultimately it is the individual who chooses, to or not to, perpetuate evil.

Sriram Khé said...

To use Warren Buffett's expression, those of us who win the ovarian lottery end up in the US, while those who were extremely unlucky get sent to Somalia and the world then somehow considers the life of an American to be a lot more important and valuable than a whole bunch of Somalis put together ... very strange ... very, very strange

While I did make references to the agents of destruction in my post--yes, the agent chooses to cause that harm--my focus was on the fact that some lives are considered more valuable than others ... a human's life in one part of the world is not the same as a human's life in another part of the world!

Chris said...

I am convinced this absurd valuation system of human life is taught and perpetuated in societies, education systems, and homes around the world, either consciously or subconsciously, but it is not necessarily something that is innate in human beings. Or is it?

Do the different valuations of human life begin as children when we instinctively place more value on our mothers, father, grandparents, and friends? Subsequently, through the means mentioned in the prior paragraph, our valuations systems continue to extend beyond our personal relationships and become altered over the years to include other human beings, known and unknown. This expansion leads to different valuation systems coming into contact with one another and creating potential tension between the systems. The results often lead to some type of conflict as one system tries to establish primacy over the other(s).

Thomas Friedman and others have made their careers discussing this tension between valuation systems as "clashes of civilizations", but why highlight the differences when highlighting the similarities among various cultures would be more fascinating and a much better contribution to humanity. I know this is wishful thinking. What harm is there is promoting idealism?

Sriram Khé said...

Oh, don't get me started on Thomas Friedman--the "master manipulator of metaphors" is how I often have referred to him in my blog. Over the past few years, he has gotten worse. He wasn't always this awful ...

Yes, anthropologists have been trying to understand for the longest time why we so often operate with this mentality of preferential treatment for those in the tribe, versus a much different treatment for those outside the tribe. I am happy with the progress we have made--as bad as things might seem now, conditions were terribly awful in the decades and centuries past. While a little bit dated, this talk by Steven Pinker is relevant in this context:
http://www.ted.com/talks/steven_pinker_chalks_it_up_to_the_blank_slate.html