Even though my eyes got to the headlines even as I picked up the paper from the porch, I had all the more the reasons to keep it for the last. You would have done the same too when the headline blared:
UO begins a new era of bargainingAfter reading through the comics pages (which were a dud!); the local pages (lots of dog-bites-man stories!); sports (Dodgers on top in the division!); opinions (nothing by me, so who cares!) I finally got to the front section and the main story:
A sea change arrives as a union forms and oversight shifts
It’s a cash problem.So far, so good, right? Finally, a recognition of the bottom-line that "it's a cash problem."
“In most states, the legislators — along with the federal government — have reduced (support) and the proportion of their budget that goes to higher education,” Boris said.
That’s true in Oregon.
The state has steadily decreased its support for its universities over the past two decades until Oregon student tuition pays the lion’s share of the cost — 70 percent — while the state pays 30 percent, according to Oregon University System figures.
Scrambling for money became a way of life at the University of Oregon.
So, what are they gonna do about it?
Fasten your seat-belts. In case you feel queasy, look away from your computer and keyboard.
Contributions from the university’s general fund to athletics has long been a bone of contention with UO faculty. The athletic department gets much of its revenue from sales of tickets and television broadcasting rights.
This past week, administrative bargainers handed the union documents confirming that the university — as opposed to the athletic department — pays about $2 million annually to provide special tutoring to student athletes exclusively at the John E. Jaqua Center for Student Athletes, the shimmering glass building at the campus entrance.
That amounts to roughly $4,000 per student athlete; the university spends a fraction of that for special tutoring of non-athlete students. In May, the university senate formally asked Gottfredson to require the athletic department to pay for the tutoring at the Jaqua Center.
At the bargaining table last week, the union’s professional negotiator, David Cecil, told the administration’s professional negotiator, Sharon Rudnick, he would evaluate the university spending on tutoring student athletes.
“We’ll let you know if we think it’s a wise investment,” he said.
Gleason said the union is entitled to an opinion, but the decision is management’s to make.
You read that correctly. Everybody recognizes that there is a cash problem. But, dammit, there is no way we are going to touch that expense item on athletics.
Wait, there is more.
That was the insanity from the management side that it was their decision to make, even if the investment in athletics is an unwise one. Faculty can be insane too--after all, we faculty didn't pursue our doctorates for nothing, and typically the deans and presidents were once faculty!
United Academics of the University of Oregon wants 16 percent increases in spending on faculty salaries over the two years for the 1,900 members in its bargaining unit. In the past week, the administration offered 10.5 percent. “That’s the one that’s the greatest challenge for all of us,” said Tim Gleason, dean of the School of Journalism and Communications and an administration bargaining team member.
The union’s proposal would cost the university $20 million more than the current two-year budget for faculty salaries. The administration’s proposal would be $14 million more — a $6 million difference, according to the administration’s figures.
16 percent. 10.5 percent. Oh well, we might as well give them a 20 percent raise.
Oh, wait. Whatever happened to the bottom-line:
It’s a cash problem.
I suppose we can pay-it-forward!