Friday, May 17, 2013

Aha! This is why pedagogy is paid so little. It is slave labor!

One student in an online class remarked something complimentary (I hope so, at least) about me bringing in readings and other materials from so many different places that are not necessarily academic in nature.  But then, that is what I have signed up for by opting for the teaching profession.  Teaching is not merely repeating  the same thing over and over to different batches of students, but to explore along with students the subjects that fascinate us.  Every exploration is a unique experience guided by results of the previous experiences and new ways of thinking that I would have picked up.

If I didn't add to my repertoire, then, hey, shoot me dead.  Fire me from my job.  Banish me to Outer Mongolia.  Anything but teaching because I will be unfit then.  Hopefully, that day is far, far away.

I know for certain that this essay (sub. reqd.) that I read in the New Yorker will affect my teaching in many, many ways.  Not that I will assign this to any of my classes--it will not fit into the currculum by any means.  But, essays like this make me think a lot about what it means to teach and, therefore, students will, of course, get to experience that.

There are so many gems in that piece, of which I want to write only about a few.

For starters, this was a shock to me:
The word "pedagogy"comes from the Greek term for the slave who escorted a child to school.
Whaaaaat?  

This being the New Yorker, with one of the best fact-checking process among all the publications, that explanation for the origin of the word has to be true.  But, come on, didn't that make you also stop and re-read it?  

The essay is about a hospital in New York--Elmhurst Hospital Center.  But, it is more than that. It is about Dr. Joseph Lieber, who has worked there almost every single day for the past twenty-five years, "working from 4 A.M. until late at night."

Lieber doesn't simply work.  People who have known him refer to him as a genius diagnostician and clinical educator--it is a teaching hospital.  The quotes from different people about Lieber make it clear, without any iota of doubt, that he knows what he does really, really, well, and is very, very good at teaching that to medical students.  But, here is the chilling truth: despite decades of such phenomenal work, he is only an associate professor without much of a compensation:
Lieber is an associate professor at Mount Sinai, and is paid less than the majority of doctors in New York.  ... "You can't advance professionally just by being an amazing clinician and teacher." ... "Lieber's an absolutely incredible physician in a way that's now completely obsolete in the field of medicine" Krieger continued. "And let me be clear what I mean by 'obsolete': that's a flaw in how medicine is evaluated and rewarded, not a flaw in what he does. He's the best diagnostician and teacher I've known."
If you read the entire piece, then by the time you reach what I have excerpted, you would yell out, as I did, "what the fuck!"

It is one awful, awful, aspect of higher education--whether in medicine or in philosophy, it doesn't matter--that only research and grant money are rewarded, not teaching.  Plenty has been written about it, but it is difficult to change direction, it seems like.

The author did ask Lieber about this:
[He] shrugged. "Oh, people are always giving teachers a hard time," he said. ... "It's true that it's research that gets the kudos," he said. "You have to love what you do."
Now, I feel so petty when complaining about how I was denied promotion to full professor level, and that I am condemned to be only an associate until I retire or die.  Here is a guy who is universally acclaimed for his knowledge and teaching and he shrugs off the fact that he doesn't get paid like others or that he hasn't been recognized with awards.  

Teaching is awfully difficult.  It really is.  The essay quotes another Mount Sinai specialist:
"Sometimes it feels like Sartre's 'No Exit': you find yourself saying the same things over and over again; you have to remind yourself that it's a new group of students, that they're not just the same people renewing their ignorance to torture you."
A good reminder, yes.  Even if pedagogy meant in the original "slave who escorted a child to school."  Am glad to be such a slave, and I look forward to many more years of escorting students, even if only as an associate professor.

3 comments:

Ramesh said...

Its part of the broader question that I have been wrestling with recently- why does society place wildly differing values on professions so much so that they seem to contradict our notions of usefulness of the profession.

Lieber is a hero. I had similar experiences in the business school I was from. Quite a few eminent Profs , great teachers, with some 20 plus years of teaching experience were there. Their student, on the day of passing out made more in a month than their entire annual remuneration.

There are many people in many professions, for whom money is not the greatest motivator. Neither is it status or promotion. On such lofty shoulders (including that of a geography Prof we know ), will many of the next generation rise.

Sriram Khé said...

Hey, you were in B-School quite some years ago, before the Narasimha Rao/Manmohan Singh days ... I would assume that since then it would have become more difficult to recruit faculty at those schools; yes/no?

Thanks for the compliments ... as always, you overestimate what I do and am capable of ...

Ramesh said...

Yes, very difficult to recruit faculty of great quality in my alma mater. because the earnings differential exists even today. On passing our the greenhorn student earns more in a month than the annual salary of a tenured Prof.