It was the primitive days of the internet back in 1988 and, for all practical purposes, it was still the DARPNnet that was what research universities had made accessible to students like me also. In those internet-prehistoric times, we relied on groups like soc.culture.indian to get informed about the latest news on India.
It was through that group that I knew, within hours of the incident, of Zia-ul-Haq's demise twenty-four years ago.
I celebrated.
I never liked Zia. Primarily because I didn't care for anybody who got into power through a coup and did everything to weaken the democratic institutions and processes, which were weak to begin with in Pakistan. Further, as a kid, I had a soft spot for Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, and the atrocious manner in which Zia had him tried and executed didn't appeal to the teenager that I was then.
Zia's worst act was his systematic Islamization of Pakistan's society and politics, which has completely messed up the country. The country's founder, Jinnah, was a westernized counterpart to India's Nehru, and the newly independent country even chose to be under the British crown for a decade, when it became "Islamic" even in its official name. It took Zia's coup and his evil machinations for religion to enter into the public space in a big way, which then resulted in everything from assassinations to television censorship, all in the name of blasphemy.
The US conveniently made use of Zia and his Islamic allies, and actively supported and financed those fighting the Soviet Union, and the fighters included Osama bin Laden. The tangled webs we weave! Jeffrey Goldberg and Marc Ambinder summarized the US relationship with Pakistan really well: "The ally from hell." There is a good chance that within Pakistan, it is a similar feeling towards the US too!
Now, Pakistan is far from any "land of the pure" and comes across as one unruly place, with political and military leaders who seem to be remarkably messed up.
The New Yorker asks "Can a sex symbol and cricket legend run Pakistan?" In profiling the cricket legend Imran Khan, the article (subscription required) notes that whatever the outcome in the elections in 2013 (if there is no military coup before then!) "Khan is accomplishing at least one of his goals, by keeping alive a narrative of change in Pakistan."
I cannot imagine Imran Khan being able to sweep clean Pakistan's politics the way he pulverized India's cricket team time and again. The few times I have watched him being interviewed, it is understandable why the West finds him appealing. He is charismatic, talks wonderfully, and seems compatibly westernized.
But, when it comes to the ballot, I suspect that the typical Pakistani, how much ever they idolize Imran Khan for his cricket talent and success, might not vote in huge numbers for his political party and candidates. As in his personal life, politically too Imran Khan will turn out to be the proverbial guy with whom you have an affair but not marry and settle down for good.
1 comment:
Yes, Zia ul Haq has been the biggest disaster for Pakistan in its history. It was he who brought rabid islamisation to the forefront. Pakistan was a tolerant plural society until then.
But Imran Khan is hardly the answer. He may be articulate in English, but politics wise he is as bad. Pakistan desperately needs a leader of stature. For that matter India too. For that matter the world too.....
Post a Comment