Monday, January 11, 2010

Our frenzied response to terrorism only feeds it

More rational commentaries--in addition to the ones I recently blogged about--on our over-reaction to terrorism; here is Fareed Zakaria:
The purpose of terrorism is to provoke an overreaction. Its real aim is not to kill the hundreds of people directly targeted but to sow fear in the rest of the population. Terrorism is an unusual military tactic in that it depends on the response of the onlookers. If we are not terrorized, then the attack didn't work.
I don't understand why we fall for this all the time.  Is it because of politics?  That if we do not over-react then we are afraid of being tagged as wimps?  Are we always so concerned about the testicular fortitude?
Zakaria notes:
Overreacting to terrorist attacks plays into Al Qaeda's hands. It also provokes responses that are likely to be large scale, expensive, ineffective, and perhaps even counterproductive. More screening for every passenger makes no sense. When searching for needles in haystacks, adding hay doesn't help.
Yep!

No comments: