But, just because we don't like a truth, well, that truth does not simply disappear. Instead, it keeps raising its head over and over again, despite our attempts to ignore it or to whack it down the hole. We don't like our views upended and we will do our best to resist the truth.
No, this post is not about trump; though the latest detailed NY Times report might as well be a classic example of what this post is about.
For a long time, I have been blogging that choosing your parents well makes one hell of a difference. (you can now see why that NY Times piece on trump also fits here.) But, we resist the idea that so much of our future depends on that accident of birth. Providing evidence that researchers have gathered, I continue to point out this out.
Way back in 2011, for example, I quoted Branko Milanovic (via Catherine Rampell)
an astounding 60 percent of a person’s income is determined merely by where she was born (and an additional 20 percent is dictated by how rich her parents were)That goes against the idea that we prefer to believe--that individuals can and should pull themselves up by their bootstraps, and they can and will succeed. “I built what I built myself.”
More evidence on this: The American Dream Is Harder To Find In Some Neighborhoods
Note it says neighborhoods. Now check back with that Milanovic statement.
So, what does the latest piece say?
A new online data tool being made public Monday finds a strong correlation between where people are raised and their chances of achieving the American dream.
Harvard University economist Raj Chetty has been working with a team of researchers on this tool — the first of its kind because it marries U.S. Census Bureau data with data from the Internal Revenue Service. And the findings are changing how researchers think about economic mobility.
Like with climate change, here too we can have researchers do study after study. Like with climate change, people will dis the studies just because they don't support their preferred view of the world. The truth doesn't depend on what we prefer though.
Chetty found that if a person moves out of a neighborhood with worse prospects into to a neighborhood with better outlooks, that move increases lifetime earnings for low-income children by an average $200,000. Of course, moving a lot of people is impractical, so researchers are instead trying to help low-performing areas improve.If Mohammad can't go to the mountain, then we have to explore ways in which the mountain can get to Mohammad. This is where public policies come in--policies that can address this accident of (mis)fortune. Policies on "early childhood development, college and career readiness, family stability and strong social networks, ... segregation, ...pre-K programs and affordable housing."
Those are exactly the kind of issues that trump and the Republicans love to talk about, right? As in how they can kill such programs and policies! There is, according to them, a miracle drug that cures all: tax cuts for those who were born in the correct neighborhoods!
“I built what I built myself.” My ass!
No comments:
Post a Comment