Sunday, October 22, 2017

What's in a name?

A year ago, I wrote about the controversies in higher education about names of buildings.  I used the context of the discussions on two buildings at the local university in order to address a much larger issue:
History cannot be undone, of course. We can constructively move forward by learning from history, and by establishing procedures whereby philanthropy will be appropriately vetted for the money’s olfactory backstories.
An easy solution exists: Do not name buildings after living people.  And wait for a while for history to vet the dead people.

But, that is all in an ideal setting. 

In the real world, universities sell the naming rights, for all purposes, and then shit happens.

For instance, remember bill cosby?  After his shit hit all over the place, universities hurriedly rescinded the honorary doctorates they gave him, and renamed the buildings that had his name.

Even my own small-time university engages in these naming rituals in order to gain access to money and power.  Awful.

Sensing political advantages in having influential lawmakers on its side, my university named two buildings after two people (like this one.)  And then two other buildings have been named after patrons who made significant donations (like this one.)

I am old-school when it comes to all these.  I don't want to sell the naming rights.  And, I want buildings to have names that mean something to the community.  Especially in public buildings.

And, yes, even my university has one such awesome example.  The residential dining hall carries the name Valsetz.

Why Valsetz, you ask?

No, it was not some old-time timber baron who donate a chunk of change.

Valsetz is a made up name for a community that does not even exist anymore.  Exactly as Wikipedia notes:
William W. Mitchell Company started the town in 1919 and named it as a portmanteau of Valley and Siletz Railroad, whose terminus was at that location. ... Valsetz post office was established in 1920.
In the US, if there is a post office, well, that makes it a real town, however small that is.

Railroad and timber.  Those were the old days.  And those days are long gone.  Timber became less important to the economy.  The town was closed down.
In 1984, the town and most of its structures were removed, as everything in the community, property and streets included, was owned by the corporation. The post office closed the same year.
So, what is the connection with my university?  The residential dining hall is named in honor of that community:
Between 1926 and 1931, WOU, then known as the Oregon Normal School, sent 16 to 20 student teachers for six-week sessions in the Valsetz elementary school.
A kind of a history that we can, and will, always be proud about, right?

2 comments:

Ramesh said...

I completely agree with you. What's wrong with me - second consecutive post that I completely agree with :)

I would prefer not to name anything after anybody dead or alive. For there hasn't been a person who has lived on earth who has been perfect. And therefore why get into the issue at all whereby you are making judgements on the relative merits and demerits of a person.

I would prefer to name things exactly like the example you have quoted. Why not simply some made up names that are easy on the tongue and carry no significance at all.

Sriram Khé said...

You were in the wrong until two days ago; you have now been set right. Your challenge is to make sure that you don't revert to your bad habits ;)

Anonymous philanthropy has been dead for a while. People apparently will give money only if their names will be affixed to their giving. In fact, fundraisers systematically tap into this ego trip as a way to raise money. It is one heck of a crazy world in which we live.

Maybe it is easy for me to say all this because I have no big time money to give. And maybe if I had a few millions, I too would behave the same way?