We freely talked about a whole bunch of topics. Including abortion. He was opposed to it, he said, and added that he was a born-again Christian. He asked me where I stood on this issue.
When people ask me, especially when we have established our interests in constructive discussions, well, I have no hassles sharing my thoughts. I told him the long version.
During my internship way back when I was in graduate school, during a lunch time walking around in downtown Los Angeles, I came across a pro-life (anti-abortion) rally. It suddenly clicked in me that I was neither in the pro-life camp and nor was I in the pro-choice camp. To me, aborting a fetus is murder, yes. Because, pregnancy is the only way we know how to create a human life. Until science figures out some other process, abortion means terminating a life.
However, it is justifiable homicide even well into a woman's pregnancy. If she decides to terminate the pregnancy late in the second trimester, yes, she has the right to do so. Women choose to do it because they know that is the best possible outcome. Who am I to say otherwise. I cannot imagine the emotional decision-making process that a pregnant woman goes through. "Imagine" is important here--given that I am a male who has no idea about what it means to be pregnant and, that too, unexpectedly.
Of course, that student was completely taken aback with such a view. Especially because he knew that I am an atheist. But, to me, such a stand is not anything strange. As I often write here, all these are a part of a drive to understand what the point of my existence is. The meaning of life. In these contexts, I am, therefore, almost always saying yes to Camille Paglia, like in the following:
Although I am an atheist who worships only great nature, I recognize the superior moral beauty of religious doctrine that defends the sanctity of life.I truly cherish and value the sincere sanctity of life arguments that sincere practitioners offer. They--not many there are who are sincere--and I are fellow-travelers in the quest to understand the meaning of life though our preoccupation with the meaning is from different perspectives.
I like the way Paglia concludes as well:
A liberal credo that is variously anti-war, anti-fur, vegan, and committed to environmental protection of endangered species like the sage grouse or spotted owl should not be so stridently withholding its imagination and compassion from the unborn.If only we can de-link the cheap politics from such profound discussions!