In the process of laughing at the idiots, I came across the word of the day: Ackamarackus. I had no idea such a word existed. When I read that, I was initially convinced that the writer had made up the word, like how my old neighbor had created that wonderful word, exhaustipated. However, it turns out that ackamarackus is for real; who knew!
The writer notes in the context of Marco Rubio's bullshit that it was not BS but ackamarackus:
Ackamarackus is a type of BS that’s big and showy and distracting: it’s a five-star circus of bamboozlement.The Wiki dictionary notes about ackamarackus:
activity engaged in just for show; deceptive nonsenseWhich means, hmmm, Donald Trump in his entirety is ackamarackus. The guy is a deceptive and distracting nonsense, indeed. But, it is shocking how he and other nonsensical sideshows are considered eligible enough to become the next commander-in-chief!
Four years ago, back in November 2011, Dan Drezner had this to say about the GOP presidential candidates then:
Americans have elected foreign policy neophytes in the past. Some have worked out quite well in advancing US interests (Harry S. Truman) while others have not (George W. Bush). What these presidents had in common, however, was a genuine belief that foreign affairs were intrinsically important. Truman read widely on international affairs, and Bush convened a team of seasoned foreign policy advisers to tutor him on the issues two years before taking office. They understood that decisions to spend money or send troops overseas would determine how they were remembered, and affect the national security of the United States. More recent presidents have grasped the concept that economic trouble in Europe means trouble for the United States as well. Compared with past commanders-in-chief, the motto of the current Republican candidates is simple: don’t know, don’t care.Looks like he doesn't have to edit a single word there and can run with the same commentary yet again, right?
I brought that to Drezner's attention, via a tweet. It didn't take him long to respond:
This time around, the GOP's leading candidates as of now are all neophytes, running on the "logic" that their absolute lack of knowledge and experience is their greatest asset, which makes Sarah Palin seem like a theoretical physicist par excellence!Hmm... this might merit a follow-up essay. https://t.co/Lb8TMJKGFS— Daniel Drezner (@dandrezner) September 25, 2015
You see why enjoying this as farcical theatre is the best option; "all that’s missing is a tiger (or elephant?) jumping through a flaming hoop." Ackamarackus! ;)