But then, thankfully, I am only a nobody harboring such worries. It is not like such assessments are in the New York Times, in analyses authored by respected economists who are not of the "loony left."
Oh, wait, here is Tyler Cowen writing in the New York Times
the recession was a learning experience that we haven’t fully absorbed. From this perspective, the radical and sudden changes of the financial crisis were early indicators of deep fragility and dysfunctionality.In case you are not aware of Cowen, he is is an economics professor at George Mason University. Cowen and his folks at George Mason are far from the "loony left." Check out the blog that Cowen and his buddies run in order to understand their approach to public choice policies.
Anyway, back to Cowen's NY Times piece. The title of that says it all:
Don’t Be So Sure the Economy Will Return to NormalWelcome to the "new" normal!
Slowly but surely, we may be responding to these difficult revelations by scaling back our ambitions for the economy — reinforcing negative trends that were already underway. In this troubling view, we have finally begun to discover some unpleasant truths. Borrowing a phrase from the University of Toronto economist Richard Florida, it’s possible that we are experiencing a “Great Reset.”So, what do we do then? How can we reset this Great Reset?
If a reset is underway, we might have to accept that public policy cannot reverse it easily. Once unsustainable economic structures begin to fail, it takes a significant improvement to make them viable again. Yet because of the difficulty of making major changes under our current political alignment, most new government policies today are no more than changes at the margin. Perhaps the most basic problem is that it is difficult to be sure when a reset is underway, and it is harder yet to raise public alarm about changes that seem to be gradual and slow.Ouch!
Most of all, it is not always wise to fight a reset.
Perhaps the most crucial issue is whether economies will return to normal conditions of steady growth, or whether we are witnessing a fundamental transformation, unveiled in bits and pieces. Nominations for the nature of that transformation include a “robot economy,” a new political economy where elites have too much power or, perhaps, a new global economy where the United States no longer holds such a dominant position, to the detriment of American firms and workers.It is rare for economists to openly admit that "no one knows." Which means only one thing: things are not looking good. They are looking real bad.
No one knows whether or how much of a reset may be underway.
BTW, here's one more worry, which is more like a corollary. When the American economy falters, staggers, guess what the bipartisan approach is to revving up the economy? Think. Think some more. Yep, war.