Sunday, July 27, 2014

We are missing the story on a country called Africa

A plane goes down in Ukraine. We seem to kind of sort of know where that country is.  A plane goes down somewhere in that area bordering Mali, Algeria, Burkina Faso and, as the friend alerted me, even the Los Angeles Times then produces map about the country of Africa!
Of course, this is not the first time it has ever happened--if I had been paid a dollar for every time I corrected a student who incorrectly referred to Africa as a country, I would be a very rich man by now.

Whether it is students or reporters or the general public, the continent is nothing more than a big blob to most of us. A messed-up "country" out there somewhere.  Clueless we almost always are!  We do too little for the place we should all call home, right?


Plenty has been said and written about this atrocious marginalization of the vast geography and its people.  Anjan Sundaram adds to that commentary and he understates it when he notes:
Our stories about others tell us more about ourselves.
Yes! :(

A few weeks ago, NPR reviewed Sundaram's book, which was my first ever introduction to his work.  In his op-ed, Sundaram writes about his background, which I recall from that NPR report and this interview with Jon Stewart.
As a student in America, where I was considering a Ph.D. in mathematics and a job in finance, I would read 200-word stories buried in the back pages of newspapers. With so few words, speaking of events so large, there was a powerful sense of dissonance. I traveled to Congo, at age 22, on a one-way ticket, without a job or any promise of publication, with only a little money in my pocket and a conviction that what I would witness should be news.
I am always way impressed with people like Sundaram, who choose to walk away from the safety and comforts of the well-traveled roads--especially in his case after an undergraduate degree from the IIT at Madras, a graduate degree from Yale, and a job offer from Goldman Sachs.  Next to people like Sundaram, I am nothing but a facade, if at all. Always lacking his kind of a drive, determination, and dedication, it is no surprise that I am forever wondering whether I coulda been a contender!

As Sundaram writes about the news organizations and his life as a stringer for the AP:
Reporters move like herds of sheep, flocking to the same places at the same times to tell us, more or less, the same stories. Foreign bureaus are closing. We are moving farther away.
News organizations tell us that immersive reporting is prohibitively expensive. But the money is there; it’s just often misallocated on expensive trips for correspondents. Even as I was struggling to justify costs for a new round of reporting in Congo, I watched teams of correspondents stay in $300-per-night hotels, spending in one night what I would in two months. And they missed the story.
Parachuting in with little context, and with a dozen other countries to cover, they stayed for the vote but left before the results were announced. A battle broke out in Kinshasa after they left, and I found myself hiding in an old margarine factory, relaying news to the world, including reports to this newspaper.
And after he left?
For years after I left Congo, my position with The A.P. remained — as it is now — vacant. The news from Congo suffers as a result, as does our understanding of that country, and ultimately ourselves. Stories from there, and from places like the killing fields of the Central African Republic, are still distant, and they are growing smaller.
The vast "country" of Africa is getting more and more distant and smaller even as we talk about how the world is shrinking thanks to all the interconnectedness.  "Our stories about others tell us more about ourselves." Indeed!

4 comments:

Ramesh said...

Geographical ignorance is no new thing. Most people in the world can't point to Ukraine on the map either.

Travel is the only way to broaden the mind . Quite apart from geographical education, it helps in understanding diversity, different cultures, respect for other ways of life and so much more. If you can't afford to travel, reading can be a good, though , imperfect substitute.

Part of the reason for indifference is the poor way that geography, like history, is taught in schools. Cramming in facts rather than stimulating interest in another culture does great disservice to the natural curiosity about other places.

American news agencies are no standard to hold anything by. Its BBC my friend, that leads the world. And their Africa Desk is simply outstanding.

Sriram Khé said...

I agree with you about the awesome service that BBC provides. Their any desk, for that matter, is phenomenal.
Which is where it gets interesting for me ... you are a private sector, market-oriented, guy. And the BBC is a government funded/subsidized service.

We can make a pretty good case that a market-driven news would then mean an allocation of resources to cover Justin Bieber and whether his bowels moved any particular morning. The market drives news down to the lowest, lowest common denominator--a pressure that BBC doesn't have thanks to its funding being secure. (The funding security, via other means, is also why NPR here is awesome, though NPR does not have global correspondents like how BBC has.)

So ... will you merely accept that this is a classic case of how market does not get it but the government can? Or, will you put up a spirited argument of how the BBC can be even better if it were completely privatized?

Ramesh said...

Oh; I am not in the camp that says ONLY the private sector can provide efficient products and services. Far from it. There are of course examples of great public sector enterprises. What I do not believe is monopolies of any kind - government or private. You need an efficient and free market.

Having said that it is hard to have truly outstanding state owned enterprises, because it is in the nature of Ramamritham to intervene and mess it up. That is why examples of outstanding state enterprises are rare, and when they exist, they must be feted and celebrated.

Having said that, the BBC is not a typical state owned enterprise. Most public sector organisations in the UK are awful. The BBC is professionally run and because of the need for media independence, is actually insulated well from the government. The only link is the license fee funding, which is a unique model but in practice is no different from crowdfunding . The BBC stands alone in the media world for outstanding global excellence. They are very very unique and special.

Sriram Khé said...

Ok, with that assertion, you have earned the right to continue to be a friend and, more importantly, to be an argumentative Indian for the next 100 blog-posts ;)