Quite some years ago, during my California life, my parents came for a visit. My mother appreciated the cleaner air and water. No sneezing sounds from father.
And that was in one of the dirtiest places in California! Even now it is!
Years later, they visited Australia after my brother immigrated to the land down under. My parents could feel the difference via what their bodies were telling them.
The sneezing and everything else returned every time they got back to their own settings.
And where they live is not even the dirtiest city in India.
News reports suggest that China's cities easily out-pollute India's cities. I shudder to think what a visit for a couple of days will do to my system, especially when I go there from the clean and green Oregon where I live.
Commenting about China's pollution, and whether it is all worth it, is not new here. (like here or here.) Yet, I am always blown away by the stories of China's pollution and how people deal with it.
No surprise, therefore, to read this in the Economist:
Chinese emigrants are leaving good jobs, cashing out their high-priced homes (or investment properties) and leaving China’s rat race behind. They are unlikely to find better jobs anywhere else, but the air and water are less polluted where they are going, the social safety-net less frayed and the food safer to eat. And there is no one-child policy.If they can, people will vote with their feet!
Others are keeping one foot, or one half of their marriage, back in China, unsure they want the slower-paced life abroad. Windson Song, a 35-year-old marketing manager in Beijing, and his wife and baby boy, are close to getting approval for permanent residence in the Canadian province of Quebec, where they meet the requirements for skilled-worker emigration (his wife’s ability to speak French helped). She and the child will go first, and will perhaps fulfil the requirement of living in Canada for three out of four years. Mr Song prefers to stay behind in Beijing, where career opportunities in marketing are much better. He often thinks, though, about his first day in Australia as a student a decade ago. It was a “fairytale world”, he says, with “green trees, colourful flowers”, few people and almost no cars. He wants the option of escaping Beijing’s grim cityscape. But his émigré friends remind him that although (or perhaps because) it is safer, cleaner and less corrupt, life is “really boring” abroad.Indeed, to the immigrant who cannot adapt to the way of life in these "cleaner" locales, life can be excruciatingly boring. Painful. Depressing. Even in the most scenic settings. After all, happiness comes from within.
It is not quite easy, it seems, to develop a Solomon's split the kid approach to having one half of the marriage in polluted China and another part in a cleaner paradise. The split could become real:
A Beijing man is seeking to divorce his wife after she took their son to a tropical island province to escape the capital's notorious smog, saying the long-distance relationship had destroyed their marriageNow, it is not as if the wife left Beijing and emigrated to Australia:
[Their]son developed serious health problems because of Beijing's air pollution and his wife took the son to the southern resort island of Hainan to escape the haze.Who woulda thunk that smog might kill marriages too!
However, Wang's wife did not like Hainan and nor did she like living apart from him, and whenever the two of them met they fought, the report said.
Fed up with this, Wang has filed for divorce in a Beijing court, the newspaper said.
"Smog 'buried' my son's health, and it has 'buried' my marriage," he was quoted as saying.
Back in India, father sneezes, and mother coughs. And they are not bored.