So, yet another
terrorist attack* mass killing. Instead of a movie complex, it is a gurudwara this time.
Yet, we won't talk about guns in our society.
Because, similar to how there is a pledge that Grover Norquist extracts from Republicans,
the NRA has made it essentially mandatory for Republicans, and Democrats too, to pledge support for gun rights, at the expense of anything else, including our freedom to go to a movie or a gurudwara without getting shot there!
Former president
George H.W. Bush put it well recently: "Who the hell is Grover Norquist?"
But then, he isn't running for any office is he! But, at least, he said that much. I wonder if he will dare to say anything critical about the NRA though.
As a policy person, I understand that gun-related deaths have actually decreased in the US, especially when you factor out the drug dimension. But, what frustrates me is how much even a meaningful discussion on guns has been completely precluded. As a society we can talk about many, many issues but not about guns. It is easy to dismiss an inconsequential worry-wart like who me thinks that this censorship of policy discussions is not the best for democracy. But, when
the head of one of the most prestigious policy think-tanks, RAND, expresses it, well, we better take notice:
I worry that there are some topics now where the policy options is just
completely off limits, so polarizing. A few examples are gun control, another one is the question of national standards
when it comes to K-12 education — there a full comprehensive look at
reform ought to include a careful analysis of that, but that is one of
the 'third-rail' issues very difficult to do that in a way that doesn't
generate a polarized reaction. Another one is concern about the growing
burden of health costs on the military and veteran systems.
It is nuts that we can't even engage in discussions on gun control. Damn the NRA!
The dysfunctional Congress can conveniently duck this latest act of home-grown terrorism--it is now on a summer break! So,
what did the do-nothing-Congress do to earn this recess?
[Most] folks only take time off when they get their job done—and that definitely isn’t the case for the 112th Congress.
While Midwest farmers suffer through
the worst drought in decades,
the House left a bipartisan farm bill passed by the Senate sitting on
the table. Certainly, there’s room for improvement in that traditionally
pork-filled appropriation bill. But make the improvements and pass the
damn bill—the all-or-nothing tug-of-war between the perfect and the good
doesn’t help people who need it now.
Even more resonant to anyone who uses the post office (which is just about everyone) is the fact that our once-proud USPS is about to default on a $5.5-billion payment. This has been a slow-motion implosion,
and the Senate got its act together to pass a bipartisan bill months
ago that would help avoid default. But the House had different
priorities. Instead, the chamber found time to rename 60 post-office
branches and attempted to repeal the health-care law for the 33rd time.
As
Gail Collins writes, given the low approval ratings for Congress, perhaps they will figure out how to get into the negative numbers too!
Maybe Congress will pick up the ball when it comes back to town for a
couple of weeks this fall before the election. But it already has a full
agenda of futile, symbolic votes plus the crucial kicking the can down
the road.
Maybe it’s possible to have a negative approval rating.
The presidential candidates are not keen on making it easy to like them either. With everything going on that needs to be addressed,
what is Mitt Romney's latest gripe?
The Romney campaign released a new TV ad on Sunday in which the GOP
presidential candidate calls the connection between the United States
and Israel “a cherished relationship” and criticizes President Obama for
not visiting the country since being elected president nearly four
years ago.
The 30-second ad 
also criticizes Obama for “refusing to recognize” that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel.
It is so tempting to say "that's right, m*f*ers," as Jon Stewart might say in such a context. We have a gazillion problems at home and around the world, and Romney wants us to ask Obama why he hasn't recognized Jerusalem as Israel's capital? WTF!
Obama's surrogate, Harry Reid, goes on an all-out offensive quoting a cannot-be-named-Bain-insider that Romney didn't pay taxes for a gazillion years. Yes,
we understand the politics behind that--keeping all the attention on Romney and his taxes during the slow news of the dog days of August. But, come on, no other pressing matters on which the country has to engage in substantive discussions?
I understand, all the more now, how much my life would have been more pleasant if I had never been bitten by the political bug even when I was a kid. I could then have made use of this wonderful advice from America's Finest News Source:
:
a
*Update: The FBI is apparently treating this as
domestic terrorism
