Tuesday, September 19, 2017

Did you know that I am an Asian-American?

First, read the following sentences from an otherwise wonderfully informative essay:
Iraq taught us the cost of going to war against an adversary that we do not fully understand. Before we take a radical step into Asia, we should be sure that we’re not making that mistake again.
Do you see what I see?

No?

"Before we take a radical step into Asia" is the key there.

That phrasing seems to ignore that Iraq is in Asia.  (Afghanistan, too, is in Asia.)  So, it should be phrased as "Before we take another radical step into Asia." Right?

Perhaps you are thinking that I am being picky.  No, I am not.

In the US, "Asians" has come to mean only people from the Far East: China, Korea, Japan, Vietnam,  and maybe even the Philippines.  This has been an issue that I have been fighting ever since my graduate school days when I reminded many white Americans that I too am an Asian.

One of my favorite encounters on this topic was post-graduate school, when I was working as a transportation planner.  An Anglophile colleague, Marilyn, walked over to my work space during a coffee break to ask me a question.  She was reading a novel set in London, and was confused that the Indian, Pakistani, and Bangladeshi characters were being referred to as Asians.  I had to explain to her that Asia is a continent, and people from that continent are Asians, as much as the French and the Czech are Europeans!

A couple of months ago, I wrote a letter to The New Yorker, on this very topic.
In the essay on how television made Trump's presidency possible, Emily Nussbaum writes that “The Apprentice” attracted diverse contestants and audience.  Nussbaum notes: "It also featured contestants from Asian, Indian, and Middle Eastern backgrounds, and, in Season 5, recent immigrants."  In that sentence, Nussbaum makes the same mistake that is often made here in the US--she identifies "Asian" as being separate from "Indian, and Middle Eastern," even though India and the Middle East are very much part of Asia.
In America, "Asians" has come to mean only those from from the far eastern edges of Asia--like China, Japan, Korea, Vietnam.  Perhaps this resulted from our military entanglements with those countries.  But then given our military expeditions elsewhere, like in Afghanistan and Iraq, and one would think that by now we would have figured out that the people of those countries too are Asians!
I didn't care whether that would be published (it was not) but I had to get that off my chest!  This time, I am not going to bother writing to that magazine again about Iraq being in Asia.  It is a losing battle!


7 comments:

Ramesh said...

Yes, this is a peculiarly American problem that I have noticed many times before. Asia is East Asia to Americans. Nussbaum's characterisation is the typical American characterisation and it pisses off Pakistanis and Bangladeshis no end to be referred to as "Indians".

This largely does not happen in Europe. Perhaps because of a long history of colonisation, Europeans, in general, are less geographically challenged.

Geography can be a fascinating subject if taught well in schools. With the rise of the internet and the availability of audio visual media, geography can easily be the most captivating of school subjects. However, in India, it is taught in so utterly boring and useless a manner that no child will ever be interested in it. What a pity.

I remember many years ago, I got a letter in the post. It was a chain letter from a child in Scandinavia. It was a geography project she was doing. It was a letter which was to be sent to a friend who was in a different country , who in turn was to send it to a friend in a different country and each was requested to add a photo of his city and a small write up of the place. When it had done 20 countries, the last person was to send it back to the girl. What a fascinating way to learn about countries.

gils said...

On the other hand..guess.. Canadians, Mexicans, the west indies group of islanders, would all be equally offended to be called North Americans..or Americans in short. May be this is one of the reasons why they get confused between continents and countries other than their sheer unwillingness to learn geography:D

Sriram Khé said...

I can imagine "Pakistanis and Bangladeshis" getting pissed off when they are IDed as Indians. Imagine if they are not even recognized as Asians!!!

Nope, it is not about what is taught as geography or history in schools. This is a reflection of the cultural-political contexts. Which is why Europeans, unlike Americans, don't restrict "Asians" only to those from the Far East.

The Scandinavian girl's project is an example of the kinds of interesting school projects that kids can do and learn. Back in our days we also did pen pals, right?

Yes, Ecuadorians, too, are Americans ;)
More here: http://sriramkhe.blogspot.com/2011/06/us-standing-in-world-what-me-worry.html

gils said...

//I can imagine "Pakistanis and Bangladeshis" getting pissed off when they are IDed as Indians. Imagine if they are not even recognized as Asians!!!//

:D i would blame history rather than present day geography for that. But fair point on the "Asian" identity.

Europeans colonized a lot of the world. So they knew where they won, i guess. America is a self centered, 3 century old, adolescent kid of a country. But the native red indians might disagree with me. Once i read my description on some document as male, Caucasian with brown eyes etc. Way too specific. Innum Vitta neanderthal-like bent back homo sapien nu potrupanga!!! Akkaraikku ikkarai pachai :D

Sriram Khé said...

Hey, to refer to Native Americans as "red indians" is not kosher. I understand that in India this phrase is still being used, but is not ok.

"Europeans colonized a lot of the world. So they knew where they won"
The other way of saying this in the context of the US is this: "God created war so that Americans would learn geography." And that is not a new idea--I am quoting Mark Twain here!!!
http://sriramkhe.blogspot.com/2015/10/cameroon-latest-attempt-to-educate.html

So, if you want the US to understand India, maybe you are inviting a whole lot of trouble ;)

gils said...

:D:D:D nope..as it is we've quite a lot of internal understanding happening here. No need for carrot tops intervention.

gils said...

// refer to Native Americans as "red indians" is not kosher. I understand that in India this phrase is still being used, but is not ok.//
ohh.i didnt knew that red indians is not the right term to address. As u said its still the politically correct term of reference across all media here.