These two comments are not anything new. Years ago, one student wrote in a long letter of appreciation that she really didn't know about my politics even after having known me throughout her undergraduate years. Which is exactly how it ought to be; my political philosophy ought to be irrelevant and immaterial to students. Right?
It is one thing when biologists have political preferences; after all, mitochondria are not influenced by political views. But, in the humanities, the social sciences, business, and a gazillion other things that universities offer, well, it is pretty much all politics. Rare will be a business faculty with uber-left leanings, and perhaps rarer will be a sociologist with ultra-right political views. Yet, we pretend that our "research" is all objective. Ha!
In October Russell Roberts, a research fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution, tweeted that if told an economist’s view on one issue, he could confidently predict his or her position on any number of other questions.The people rose in protest with tweets, blog-posts, and position papers!
As Mr Roberts suggested, economists tend to fall into rival camps defined by distinct beliefs. Anthony Randazzo of the Reason Foundation, a libertarian think-tank, and Jonathan Haidt of New York University recently asked a group of academic economists both moral questions (is it fairer to divide resources equally, or according to effort?) and questions about economics. They found a high correlation between the economists’ views on ethics and on economics. The correlation was not limited to matters of debate—how much governments should intervene to reduce inequality, say—but also encompassed more empirical questions, such as how fiscal austerity affects economies on the ropes. Another study found that, in supposedly empirical research, right-leaning economists discerned more economically damaging effects from increases in taxes than left-leaning ones.Seriously? They needed to do research on this? It shows what pretentious lives economists lead believing that their thinking is not political and is only--and nothing but--scientific!
That is worrying.
even if economics is not uniquely ideological, its biases are often more salient than those within chemistry. Economists advise politicians on all manner of important decisions. A reputation for impartiality could improve both perceptions of the field and the quality of economic policy.For Brutus is an honourable man;
So are they all, all honourable men