First an excerpt from
this piece:
As professional sports grew into a multibillion-dollar enterprise,
colleges followed suit. Small programs grew big; big programs grew huge,
all chasing ESPN glory and cash. So, in turn, high-school athletics
programs grow, emulating their big siblings on campuses.
There is a widespread consensus that our public-education systems are
in serious trouble. But amid the conflicting diagnoses of the
problem—teacher training, standardized testing, socioeconomic
conditions—we have missed this obvious one: The growth of high-school
athletics over the past generation has necessarily meant fewer resources
devoted to academics, especially in the zero-sum budgetary environment
of so many school districts.
Yep, the effect trickles down to high schools (and lower too?) despite any number of horrible problems at the professional and collegiate levels.
After annus horribilis 2011, no one can deny with a straight
face the corrupting effect of our athletics-business complex on higher
education. We need to reckon, however, with the toll that college
athletics and all its trappings take on high-school education as well.
Should we then be surprised at all that our public education doesn't deliver?
Recently, American school reformers have been flocking to Finland to
discover what makes their primary and secondary education so good.
However, as my Ohio State colleague Kenneth Kolson wrote recently in a
letter to The New York Review of Books, most of them fail to
acknowledge that Finnish schools "offer no team sports, which means no
'student-athlete' hypocrisy, no cheerleaders, no pep rallies, and no
architectural shrines devoted to the cult of youthful athletic prowess."
He is under no illusion that the Finnish model can be replicated here.
