Elvis, the Beatles, and the Rolling Stones: same generation!

Because Elvis was already an established star by the time the British invaded the US with their music, we tend to assume that somehow Elvis was much older than the Beatles or the Rolling Stones.  Well, compare their birthday info:

Elvis Presley: January 8, 1935
John Lennon:October 9, 1940
Paul McCartney: June 18, 1942
Ringo Starr: July 7, 1940
George Harrison:  Feb 25, 1943
Mick Jagger: July 26, 1943

Elvis and Lennon separated by a mere five years and months.  It is not as if they were a generation apart.  But, it is their music that makes us think that these are of two different generations.  And, add to this list Bob Dylan, who was born in 1941.

I suppose it is a challenge that performance artists have--how to keep up with the changing times, and the younger audiences ....  Hmmm ... to some extent we faculty also face similar issues in our working lives.  We have to keep up with the times and the rapidly changing technology and student expectations.  I am glad then that a couple of terms ago a student told me that I am "with it" in the way I conduct myself and my classes.  It will be awful if I am no longer able to connect with the students; I hope that day does not arrive too soon .. at least not before I turn 64 :)

More Mick Jagger: Ahem, you lie, "Sir" :)

Sir Mick has been in the news a lot recently because of the music from the "year in exile" ... no, he did not lie about the music, or the year in France ... well, this is what Sir Mick said:

"We were young, good-looking and stupid," he told the audience. "Now we're just stupid."

Mick Jagger and Keith Richards being "good-looking" then?  That is the lie .... muahahaha

He does sound quite existentialist here, eh:

"Everyone's life comes to an end. We'll all die, we all have the same fate, but I think you should just keep going while you can, doing what you like."

 Rock on, Sir Mick!

Mick Jagger talks economics

Sir Mick Jagger was an undergraduate student at the prestigious London School of Economics before, well, you know the music story.  So, it does not surprise me at all to read his observations on the dollars and cents of recording and the internet (ht):

Things have obviously changed a great deal since those sessions. What's your feeling on technology and music?

Technology and music have been together since the beginning of recording.

I'm talking about the internet.

But that's just one facet of the technology of music. Music has been aligned with technology for a long time. The model of records and record selling is a very complex subject and quite boring, to be honest.

But your view is valid because you have a huge catalogue, which is worth a lot of money, and you've been in the business a long time, so you have perspective.

Well, it's all changed in the last couple of years. We've gone through a period where everyone downloaded everything for nothing and we've gone into a grey period it's much easier to pay for things - assuming you've got any money.

Are you quite relaxed about it?

I am quite relaxed about it. But, you know, it is a massive change and it does alter the fact that people don't make as much money out of records.

But I have a take on that - people only made money out of records for a very, very small time. When The Rolling Stones started out, we didn't make any money out of records because record companies wouldn't pay you! They didn't pay anyone!

Then, there was a small period from 1970 to 1997, where people did get paid, and they got paid very handsomely and everyone made money. But now that period has gone.

So if you look at the history of recorded music from 1900 to now, there was a 25 year period where artists did very well, but the rest of the time they didn't.

Throughout history, musicians and artists generally did not earn lots of money--same story with teachers, too. For a brief while, as Sir Mick points out, yes, there was real money for musicians--it was almost the same time period that was also the best of times for teaching.  Now, once again teaching is rapidly losing the little bit of economic prosperity that it enjoyed for a couple of generations.  Well, aren't such changes the kind of stuff that history is made of?  May we live in interesting times, indeed!