Saturday, August 19, 2017

There's no business like ... sustainable business?

Profits are apparently better guides than prophets, as we found out post-Charlottesville.  To some extent, it should not surprise us; after all, businesses are all about the here and now, and not about heaven or hell.  So, if even the appearance of siding with the fuhrer would hurt their bottom-lines, then, of course, business leaders would abandon the fascist.

The fascist and his minions deny climate change, and by loosening up regulations and promoting activities that will further destroy the natural environment, they are all set to bring about hell on earth, instead of making heaven right here on earth.  The fuhrer gleefully announced that he was withdrawing the US from the Paris agreement.  What does the market think about all these?  Will business leaders cheer the maniac, or are they taking a different approach?

Harvard Business Review takes this up, which is made clear in the headline itself:


No ambiguity there, right?  HBR has created "the Future Economy Project."
We’ve enlisted prominent thinkers and leading CEOs who understand that sustainable business practices are in a company’s long-term interests. They will help us answer questions like: How does sustainability fit into a company’s strategy? How can you make core business operations more sustainable? How do you convince major stakeholders — employees, investors, the board, and customers — that sustainability is the right path? And what type of leadership will take us there?    
HBR adds:
We don’t pretend to have all the answers — and neither do the pioneering business leaders who are joining this initiative. But over the coming months, we will provide case studies and practical lessons from their experiences to help other executives who believe that profits and environmental responsibility must go hand in hand.
The Future Economy Project will culminate in the publication of a list of principles and actions, endorsed by our partners, aimed at outlining a path for businesses that want to pursue sustainable goals. The principles will reflect our partners’ thinking on how to operationalize sustainability throughout the enterprise.    
One of the HBR essays leads with this:
Despite conflicting messages about climate change from U.S. government leaders, sustainability is getting more and more attention at American companies. Shareholders are ratcheting up their demands on environmental and social issues. Consumers are registering their concerns about how companies make their products. And talented Millennial employees are voting with their feet by leaving laggard companies behind. Meanwhile, new technologies are making it easier for sustainability investments to pay off in the middle to long term.
I have always believed that transformations will be less of a hurdle if we created the appropriate contexts for the profit-motive.  Because, merely appealing to people to do the right thing rarely works, if ever.  And once we tap into that profit motive, things can happen seemingly overnight.

Of course, as conservative organizations, businesses are resistant and reactionary, especially if the change will not help the bottom-line.  But, businesses--unlike politicians--are not ideological and, hence, do change their outlook.  Therefore, in addition to yelling at politicians, we the people ought to yell even louder at businesses.  Chances are that businesses will listen to us and act way quicker than the elected official will.

At the university where I teach, for a year we worked on creating a new academic major called "sustainability."  I think my most important contribution there was to structure it such that students could focus on their business interests in sustainability.  To me, it was a no-brainer that business should be a part of the major.   For once, people actually listened to me! ;)  This HBR report adds that much more validation of the major that we have created.

2 comments:

Ramesh said...

Get Paul Polman of Unilever as a speaker for your course.

Yes, of course, businesses react fast. But politicians react even faster. They are more sensitive to the moods of the electorate than businessmen are to consumers. So when you don't get the response from politicians to something, it simply means the electorate does not believe in it.

The reality is that the majority of Americans do not believe in climate change or sustainability strong enough. Many of your fellow citizens embrace an excess consuming, me first and screw everybodyelse culture. The majority doesn't want to change that. They are OK to talk about climate change action but not do anything about it. The state of California is an honourable exception.

Politicians are the mirror to society. Blame them and you are simply shooting the messenger.

Sriram Khé said...

"politicians react even faster"
That is the old model. What trump and the new reality shows is that politicians can be way slower than business leaders can be.
Politicians play to their voters, yes. But, that also means that politicians care less about the youth, and the world outside the US. In contrast, the CEOs of businesses in trump's councils are all multinational, and the younger customers are key to their business prospects. The businesses have no choice but to pay attention to what their customers say, even though that customer demographic matters less to the politicians' votes. The GOP has a demographic base that helped in 2016 and might help even in 2018 and 2020. But, it is screwed after that because by then the youth that matters to businesses will show up at the voting booths in large numbers.
So, yes, politicians are the mirror--but, only because the youth are not standing in front of the mirror, while the old and middle-aged white take up all the space in front of the mirror.