Now, when I routinely discuss demographics in economic geography, I suppose some of the students--those paying attention--also begin to appreciate the important role that population change plays in our lives. One of my favorites is to tell them that the longer we older people live, the less they will have. If the class mood is right, I joke that they should not take it upon themselves to push us old folks off the cliffs ;)
With this president at the helm, and with his minions also not concerned about facts, I worry that we are not thinking about the world of a few years from now. Take 2020, for instance. Yes, that is when we will have the next presidential election. But, from a demographic perspective, it will be a "yuge" deal for the world: For the first time in human history, there will be more people in the world over age 65 than under age 5. Let me repeat that sentence for you: For the first time in human history, there will be more people in the world over age 65 than under age 5. Get it?
Source |
That is worldwide. In the old days, the lucky grandparents barely lived into their sixties. Not anymore. And not into the future. Think of the economic implications. Yes, the money aspect. And think about one of the major issues--heath. You think this president is thinking about all those? Of course not! Imagine if we had a president and a bunch of leaders who were responsible and ethical and talked about such issues with substance.
We need such substantive discussions. Consider the healthcare quagmire in which the Geriatrics Only Party has trapped itself. And then think about the following chart:
Source |
Source |
2 comments:
Your "plan" is not a plan. You may wish, but God disposes !
I have long railed against the disproportionate spending by society on the elderly instead of the young. In your country that is in health care. In my country that is in pensions. It is ridiculous when the pension spend is many times more than the education spend.
I hugely fault the old (yes, that includes myself) for simply being selfish and screwing their children. Why does somebody above 85 want $34783 spent on them and then cry "Death Panels" as soon as anybody talks about that number. A large proportion of that money is spent on the last one year of life. Why oh Why ?
What about the massive national debt that our generation is leaving behind for our children. They have to pay for our lifestyle. Fantastic.
Our generation has much to be ashamed about.
You are wrong. In our country, it is health care AND pensions!!!
Every rational public policy person knows, and has also written, about the insane amounts that we spend on the health care of the really old. People like Atul Gawande can rattle off real data (not alternative facts) at the drop of a hat ... But the issue has become so politicized that we are beyond any constructive approach!!!
It is not "our generation" that has to be ashamed. At least here in the US, it is the fault of the previous one--the white Baby Boomers!
Post a Comment